Huge scope:
Social and historical grounding to “Remember Who’s Emma”
1. Social context in the 1990s – The decade punk broke (again)
2. The Toronto scene – and who is Emma?
2. 1. The Temporary Autonomous Zone (TAZ) vs. social anarchism
2. 2. The paradox of anarchist retail
2. 3. Youth identity production: Self Representation and media representation
2. 4. Events (shows and meetings) – rites of passage and turning points for Who’s Emma
2. 5. Waning collective participation: No future?
2. 6. Closing frustrations, but punk success in failure
3. Conclusion(s) to the social and historical grounding of Who’s Emma
Production process of the “Remember Who’s Emma” documentary project
4. Video catalyst – mobilization tool and historical record
5. Initial ideas: a participatory video database/archive documentary project
6. The value of narrative and tension between “Documentary” and new media
7. A new media resolution of expository and participatory documentary modes
8. Exhibition and events – the sociability of place
9. Dissemination and networking – creating a virtual place for Who’s Emma
CONCLUSION
It was important and pivotal in peoples lives. End.
—-
My defense is on Tuesday. I’m still in the process of reviewing and compiling the footage of the punk walking tour and the show that happened in the exhibition space. I will definitely post videos of those events soon. There’s some good footage, or at least I get a kick out of it.
